My Account | Login | Checkout

You are not logged in
Textbooks

Enter the search term for the product you are looking for below:

Student Support



Welcome! Your professor has assigned BUSINESS ETHICS: TEXT AND WORKBOOK as required reading for your class. We hope you enjoy the book -- it's not your average textbook -- and we're sure you appreciate its modest cost. To help you out even more, on this page you'll find the "Test Yourself" questions plus all the assignments for each chapter. You can copy these questions and/or assignments into a word processing file and complete your assignments using your computer. Much easier that way!

CHAPTER 1: Test Yourself

  1. What are the main points of the 2003 study of the Ethics Resource Center?
  2. Name at least ten common ethics problems found in business.
  3. Is ethics the same as morals? Why or why not?
  4. Distinguish between ethics problems, temptations, dilemmas, and issues, using examples.
  5. What are four ways of defining (or thinking about) ethics?
  6. Describe three behaviors that are not ethics-related, and explain why they’re not?
  7. What’s the point of business ethics education?

Assignment 1.1: Good Business, Bad Business
Write out your answers to these two questions. Bring to class for discussion:

  1. How would you describe a really good business? What would make it really good, in your view?
  2. What about a morally bankrupt, ethically reprehensible business–how would you describe that?What would make it so, in your view?

Assignment 1.2
Can you add anything to the list of ethical situations from your own work experience? Save some room to add notes on what we learn from others in class discussion:

Assignment 1.3: Main Messages
Bring to class for discussion: Without looking back over these pages, write out two or three MAIN MESSAGES you recall from this chapter. Given what your classmates say, how well did you understand and remember the chapter’s main messages? Are there other main messages noted that you need to review?

CHAPTER 2: Test Yourself

  1. What are the essential conditions of capitalism described in this chapter?
  2. How do you define "social control"? Is it a bad thing? A good thing? Explain.
  3. What are the three types of power used in exercising social control? How are these types applied to individuals and to organizations in business?
  4. What is the Chicago School of Economics, and why do we care?
  5. Briefly answer the question: Is there room for ethics in economic behavior?
  6. Articulate Kenneth Arrow's argument on why the price system is inadequate.
  7. Map and illustrate Oliver Williamson's discussion of two key dimensions of contracting and their implications.

Assignment 2.1: Ideas About Capitalism
Capitalism has provoked some rather extreme ideas. In a later chapter we'll learn more about Aristotle's Golden Mean, but the concept is very simple: extremes are bad, moderation is good. Here's a chance to apply that idea to a very important topic. Google around until you find extreme explanations of capitalism from both ends -- left and right -- of the political spectrum. Jot down the main ideas from both extremes, and be sure to keep track of your sources. Now, consider these ideas carefully, and craft a "balanced position" or a "golden mean" for class discussion.

Assignment 2.2: Translating Adam Smith
What's your translation of this passage from Adam Smith? (See course material.) What's the main message, in ordinary language?

Assignment 2.3: Game Theory
Game theory offers considerable confirmation of Sen's off-the-cuff remark that only a fool would do business without trust. And, even moreastonishingly, game simulations with multiple players and multiple iterations, where the decision each player faces is to cheat or not to cheat in a tit-for-tat strategy, offers remarkable evidence that cheating can be isolated and snuffed out if those around the cheater are paying attention.

Prove this to yourself by finding and reporting on game theory simulations or experiments that conclude that cheating isn't in the actor's best interests. Make brief notes on your finds.

Assignment 2.4: "Greed" with John Stossel
Your instructor may show you a video in class entitled "Greed" with John Stossel. Think about the messages conveyed by this film -- the actions advocated, the values espoused, the claims made. Here are some of them, and you will no doubt find others. You can make notes in the blank space along the side of the page. What do we learn about capitalism, and ourselves, from those ideas?

  1. What do Leona Helmsley, Imelda Marcos, and Baby Doc Duvalier have in common with Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Ted Turner? What's different about them?
  2. Why is it OK for sports stars and entertainers to make lots of money, but not CEOs? Why do we think CEOs are greedy, but Michael Jordan isn't?
  3. What is greed, anyway? Consider these definitions, pick your favorite, and explain why.
    • Greed is a hunger for success, for innovation, for new knowledge.
    • Greed is the same as self-interest.
    • Greed is wanting more than you deserve.
    • Greed is wanting more than you need.
    • Greed is taking for yourself at the expense of others.
  4. "Get more for yourself by serving others -- not by caring for them." Bill Gates has to persuade us, entice us, to make all his money. Businesspeople get rich when they figure out how to give us what we want at a price we are willing to pay.
    Do you agree with these statements? Explain.
  5. Everyone wins in free exchange -- unless someone cheats. People wise up and don't let the cheaters stay around for long. Do you agree with these statements? Explain.
  6. "Too much is barely enough." What do you think drives some people to believe this and act on it?
  7. Consider these statements: "Self-interest leads people to cooperate," vs. "Wealth is a zero-sum game. If you win, I lose." But game theory tells us that there are logical reasons why we will cooperate with others, even if our raw self-interest lies in not cooperating. Explain.
  8. Is it just excessive greed that's the problem? Unrestrained greed leads to theft, fighting, and taking by force. But then, "Everybody wants more. That's capitalism! private property!" and "I built it. I own it. I deserve it."
  9. Americans seem to have an assumption that making money is bad. Charity feels more noble than making money. Do you believe this is true of American culture in general? Where do you stand on this?
  10. Shouldn't there be rules to make distribution more equal? The wage gap between the highest and the lowest paid employees has widened. But maybe it's the ones at the bottom who need free markets the most. Children in poverty are fascinated by capitalism. Where do you stand in this debate, and why?
  11. Are nonprofit organizations selfless? Isn't that better than being greedy? Or is it? What do you think?
  12. Who has done more for the world -- Michael Milken or Mother Theresa? Why do you think so?
  13. Ted Turner's billion dollar gift to the U.N. is "patently stupid," says a speaker in the film. Do you agree? Why or why not?
  14. What else did you notice and remember from this film?

CHAPTER 3: Test Yourself

  1. What is a stakeholder? Can you identify several important functional types?
  2. Explain how stakeholder interests can be best understood.
  3. Draw the stakeholder salience model, define its seven types, and give an example of each type.
  4. Can you explain the logic that underlies the stakeholder salience model?
  5. The stakeholder salience model is dynamic, not static. Why is this? Give an illustration.
  6. Companies implement stakeholder engagement in a variety of ways. What do you think a company should pay attention to when deciding how to engage stakeholders?
  7. No need to memorize the Clarkson Principles verbatim, as long as you can express their essence in simple, clear language. Can you?
  8. What is issues management?
  9. What is an expectational gap? What are the three types of gaps, and what are their attributes?
  10. If there is an expectational gap, does an issue necessarily exist? Explain.
  11. What are the stages and events in the issue life cycle? Why do you think it's important for managers to understand that issues have life cycles?
  12. Is it OK for companies to develop a single issue response strategy, no matter what type of issue arises?
  13. What is corporate social responsibility?
  14. What is corporate social performance?
  15. Friedman complains that CSR is unethical. What's his argument? How would you analyze and critique this argument?
  16. The Carroll, Wood, and Kang CSR/CSP models are logically related. Can you explain how?
  17. Connect the dots from stakeholders to issues management to corporate social responsibility and performance to business ethics.

Assignment 3.1: Companies Speak on Their Stakeholders
Compare the three statements from Pfizer, General Mills, and General Electric. What do you notice? Are the stakeholders the same for all three companies? What about the order in which stakeholders are listed? Are commitments similar? What would these statements tell you as a potential investor? As a future employee? As a member of the company's local community?

Assignment 3.2: Convince Yourself
The Venn diagram showing stakeholder categories is an exercise in logic. Work through the logic yourself by thinking through what kind of stakeholder is likely to have one, two, or all three critical attributes.

Assignment 3.3: Values in the Clarkson Principles
Try to express each of the seven Clarkson principles using just one or two words to capture its essence. Does this tell you anything about the values underlying these principles?

Assignment 3.4: Tracking an Issue Life Cycle
This assignment could be done in groups or individually, as your instructor directs. Choose a public issue related to business, research it, and track it through its various stages. Identify the trigger(s) that move the issue from nascent to developing, and identify the resolution. Show how the issue has re-emerged, plateaued, or disappeared since the resolution you identify. Be sure to keep track of the sources you use.

Assignment 3.5: Discover Friendman's Argument
Milton Friedman's New York Times Magazine piece on corporate social responsibility is out there on the web and probably also in your library's bibliographic databases. Go find this article and outline Friedman's argument. If you're really ambitious, or if your instructor tells you to, check out Friedman's book, Capitalism and Freedom, to get a better idea of his philosophy of life and of business. What do you suppose is the value that Friedman holds most dear? Your instructor may ask you to write a short paper to turn in, based on this assignment.

CHAPTER 4: Test Yourself

  1. What does it mean to see government as a form of social control?
  2. What are the Three E's that justify regulation in economic terms? Give an example of each.
  3. In terms of equity failures, what are the conditions of free and fair contracting?
  4. What are the two legal foundations of the legitimacy of U.S. regulation?
  5. What does this chapter's discussion of the Pure Food Act of 1906 tell you about regulation in America?
  6. What happened in the 1930s and 1940s that changed the direction of U.S. regulation of business?
  7. In the 1960s and 1970s, a great deal of so-called "social regulation" was promulgated. What are some examples?
  8. Describe the era of regulatory backlash and deregulation in the U.S.
  9. Defend the phrase, "regulation is a tool of the people." Now critique the phrase and offer a counter-view. What evidence would you like to have to see which viewpoint is more accurate?
  10. What is the point of global standard-setting for businesses?
  11. Name and describe the work of several international organizations involved in setting standards for business conduct.

Assignment 4.1: Exploring the Three Es of Regulation
Search for one specific example of how regulation addresses each of the three Es -- efficiency, externalities, and equity. Your example might be a particular regulation that attempts to solve a particular problem, or it might be a news story about some breach of conduct that violates regulatory standards, or it might be a story about an effort to pass a new regulatory law to plug a perceived hole in standards. Bring your examples to share with the class, and be sure to note your sources.

Assignment 4.2: Exploring Global Standards
Choose one of the organizations listed in the table above, or let your instructor assign one to you and/or your team. Go to the organization's website and find out more about it, including:

  • How and why was it formed?
  • What, specifically, does the organization focus on in terms of international ethics and/or social responsibility principles and standards?
  • Who participates in the work of this organization?
  • What can you find out about the organization's impact?

Be prepared to present your findings in class. Be sure to note your sources.

CHAPTER 5: Test Yourself

  1. Name and describe five sources of ethical problems in business, using an example for each.
  2. Are businesses and their managers mostly unethical? Explain.
  3. True or False: Greedy people can best be controlled through regular ethics training and a very visible corporate values statement. Explain your answer.
  4. Many people believe that business is like a poker game, played by its own rules. What's your answer to this, and why?
  5. "I was afraid" and "nobody told me not to" are qualitatively different explanations from people who have committed unethical behavior. Explain.
  6. What is the "OOPS!" factor?
  7. What are some good reasons for companies to want their employees to be ethical?
  8. Name the "early warning signs" of ethical trouble and give examples for at least three of them.

Assignment 5.1: Your Experience
In your own work life so far, have you experienced any of these sources of ethical problems? Which ones? Can you share a short story with the class?

Assignment 5.2: Main Messages
Without looking back over the chapter, write out two or three MAIN MESSAGES you recall from this chapter.

CHAPTER 6: Test Yourself

  1. What's the short story of the Enron fraud?
  2. What is the extimated cost of fraud, worldwide and in the U.S.?
  3. What is a good working definition of fraud?
  4. Identify the features that must be present in order for an act to be fraud.
  5. Be able to distinguish fraud from theft, and be able to identify several different types of fraud.
  6. What is COSO, and what is its relevance to the subject of fraud?
  7. What does the COSO report emphasize with respect to preventing fraud through internal controls?
  8. Conflicts of interest are important antecedents of many frauds. Give one or two examples of a conflict of interest that can easily lead to fraud.
  9. Why do you think that corporate disasters are discussed in this chapter?
  10. What is a good working definition of whistle blowing?
  11. What are some of the problems and issues associated with whistle blowing?
  12. Distinguish identity, image, and reputation.
  13. What is the relationship of fraud, disaster, and whistle blowing to reputation management?

Assignment 6.1: Learn More About Enron
To learn more about Enron's basic story, check out the interactive video, "Enron 101," available at http://www.msnbc.com/modules/enron/. A timeline of Enron events is also helpful to understand what happened. A good one detailing the emerging crisis is available at http://www.washington_post.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25624-2002Jan10.html, and the Houston Chronicle's timeline is also good: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/enron/timeline/2342585.html. One part of the story you'll want to know about concerns the effects on Enron employees' retirement accounts. Another part of the story is the account of Sherron Watkins, who would have been a whistle blower if she had gone outside with her concerns earlier.

Assignment 6.2: Famous Whistle-Blowers
You can learn what it's like to blow the whistle by examining the stories of Enron, Worldcom, Brown & Williamson and the tobacco lawsuits, Erin Brockovich, or any number of others. Search out one such story and note here your observations and insights for class discussion.

Assignment 6.3: Closing Off Fraud Opportunities
What's the problem with the four examples in the bullet list? What could go wrong? How easy do you think it would be to commit fraud in each case?

  • Fred
  • D'anae
  • Marcus
  • Sherry

Assignment 6.4: Disaster Preparedness
Go on-line and locate one or two useful sources of information about how businesses need to protect themselves from natural and human catastrophes like hurricanes and terrorist attacks. Print out the basic guidance -- that is, what should managers be aware of? What steps should they take? What should a preparedness plan look like? Should there be provision for shelter, supplies, communications? Bring your sources and the guidance they offer to class to compare with what others have found.

Assignment 6.5: The Loyalty Problem in Whistle Blowing
To bring home the issue of the complex loyalties involved in whistle blowing, imagine yourself at the center of a network of people and organizations, each having a particular relationship to you as well as relationships, perhaps, among themselves. That is, draw out your own stakeholder network (actually called a role-set in social psychology).

Then imagine that you're considering whether to blow the whistle on your company, which is involved in "midnight dumping" of toxic wastes into a field and a small stream upriver from a suburban community of young families. You have already tried to get the problem fixed internally, but senior executives are involved in the behavior and there's no one to listen to you.

Take each one of your relationships separately and trace out the loyalties that characterize it. Does the result help you decide to go ahead and blow the whistle, or are you now even more torn about this decision? Why?

Assignment 6.6: What Is Hirschman Saying?
Translate the passage from Hirschman into simple language and key points. Bring your translation to share with the class, and compare yours to others'.

Assignment 6.7: Exit, Voice, and Loyalty
Consider Hirschman's three categories of response to serious problems. Remember, we're talking about things like major product defects, life-threatening safety issues, and such. Think about being in such a situation yourself, as an employee. What conditions and circumstances might lead you to take one kind of action or another? The table in the worksheet (in the text material) gives you a couple of suggestions of relevant conditions.

Assignment 6.8: Hotlines Can Make Whistle Blowing Unnecessary
People blow the whistle when they believe they know of unethical or illegal conduct, and when they further believe that inside actions will not stop the conduct. "The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) has recommended that all organizations seriously consider establishing a whistleblower hotline due to the fraud detection benefits. In January 2005, the institute's Antifraud Programs and Controls Task Force released a tool designed to help organizations evaluate the effectiveness of their hotlines. This free tool is available on the audit committee section of the AICPA Web site, www.aicpa.org/audcommctr."

Go to the AICPA's website and find their recommendations for how to make a company hotline (now more often called helplines) work for those who have issues, concerns, or questions about ethics and legality in the workplace.

CHAPTER 7: Test Yourself

  1. Explain why values form the foundation of ethics and ethical analysis.
  2. What is the difference between values that express what is good, values that express what is right, and values that express virtues?
  3. Within-class and cross-class conflicts of values account for much of America's political debate. Choose any example and illustrate how such a conflict informs politics.
  4. What are Frederick's five "natural value clusters"? What is the role of each cluster in shaping how values drive human behavior?
  5. Explain and illustrate this statement: "Ethics and the law only partially overlap."
  6. In simple terms, what Irwin Financial's decision process for ethical matters? Choose an ethical issue and apply their method.
  7. Discuss some similarities in ethical values among the world's major religions.
  8. Identify several common moral values and explain how standards or rules behavior can be drawn from them.
  9. Explain what corporate codes of conduct are for, and what they typically contain.
  10. Explain the difference between an organizational code of conduct and a professional code of conduct.

Assignment 7.1: What Do You Value in Other People?
What are three or four things that you most admire in other people? Think, for example, about your best friend, a mentor, a parent, a favorite teacher, or someone in the community whom you would like to emulate. Bring your notes for class discussion.

Assignment 7.2: Value Clashes
Clashes of values within categories and across categories call for different coping strategies. Can you explain why?

Assignment 7.3: Economizing and Ecologizing
Take one example from economies and one from politics to show how prevalent the clashes between economizing and ecologizing are in modern life.

Assignment 7.4: Legal/Ethical
You should convince yourself that law and ethics are only partially overlapping as guides to behavior. Think through another example, and jot your analysis down in the empty figure provided in the text material.

Assignment 7.5: Common Principles
Keep a list for yourself of common principles of morality as the class goes along through the discussion.

Assignment 7.6: Comparing Common Principles
FOR DISCUSSION: Let's compare this list with the list we made in class. Did we overlook any important values or principles that we would now like to add to our list? Does the "expert" list above leave out things that we think are very important?

Assignment 7.7: Ethics Vignettes
Your instructor will pose several vignettes that illustrate ethics in ordinary business life. For each of these vignettese, try to discern what common principles of morality are at stake as we try to unpack what the issues are and what the actors should do. There's a table in the text materials to help you in your analysis. Be prepared to discuss your observations in class.

Assignment 7.8: Writing the Rules
Now that you've seen common principles in action, practice writing out the rules for behavior that the principle suggests. For each of the following principles, note the common rules.

  • Non-malevolence
  • Promise-keeping
  • Truth-telling
  • Respect for persons
  • Mutual aid
  • Respect for property
  • Fairness

Assignment 7.9: Company Codes of Conduct
Your instructor will assign you a company or -- if you're working in teams -- an industry sector. Go online and find the mission, vision, and values statements of your company or companies. Some companies post their codes of conduct on their websites. Note which ones do and don't, and bring some examples of code language to class for discussion.

Assignment 7.10: Professional Codes
Go on-line and find another professional code of conduct. You might find one for accountants, bankers, financial analysts, engineers, real estate brokers, purchasing agents, etc. Put down the site reference and extract the key principles and values.

Assignment 7.11: A Code for Mangers
There's no accepted professional code of conduct for managers. Why do you think this is? If there were such a code, what do you think it would contain?

CHAPTER 8: Test Yourself

  1. A popular book from years past was called Everything I Need to Know, I Learned in Kindergarten. How would you assess the premise in this book's title?
  2. Briefly explain Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development and its relationship to the subsequent theory of moral development.
  3. Name and describe the six stages of Kohlberg's theory of moral development. Give one or two examples of reasoning at each stage.
  4. How and why did Carol Gilligan adapt the Kohlberg six-stage schema?
  5. What is the contribution of domain theory to our understanding of moral development?
  6. What do you think is the most important contribution of moral development theory to the practice of management?

Assignment 8.1: The Heinz Dilemma
You can do this assignment alone or in groups, as your teacher instructs. It is interesting to retrace Kohlberg's basic method of discovery and try it on for size. Here's a brief version of the "Heinz story," a situation that Kohlberg often used to elicit behavioral choices and rationales from his subjects.

Poor Heinz has a terminally ill wife, and he's desparate to help her. He visits his druggist friend, who says there's a new cure, but it's very expensive. Heinz is beyond distraught. Here's the answer to his wife's illness, and he cannot afford it! The druggist shows him the drug, then sets it on the counter as he turns away to answer the phone. WHAT SHOULD HEINZ DO? WHY?

  1. Rapidly list as many reasons as you can why Heinz should steal the drug.
  2. Then, rapidly list as many reasons as you can why Heinz should not steal the drug.
  3. Compare your reasons to the stages of moral development and try to categorize them.

Assignment 8.2: The Golden Rule at Each Stage
Most people are familiar with the Golden Rule, "do unto others as you would have them do unto you," or "treat others as you want to be treated." Now that you have an understanding of Kohlberg's six stages of moral development, translate the Golden Rule into the version that a person at each stage would accept.

Assignment 8.3: Some Questions...if the Moral Development Folks Are Right
Here's a tricky management problem: How can an organization encourage ethics if there are people working in it who typically operate at different levels of moral development? What are the problems that are going to arise?

  1. Which type(s) would you rather have working for you? Why?
  2. Which type(s) would you rather work for? Why?
  3. How can an organization be designed and operated so that each employee, regardless of stage of moral development, can contribute to an ethical climate?
  4. How can organizations facilitate their employees' growth and maturity?

CHAPTER 9: Test Yourself

  1. Identify six problems that arise when the Golden Rule is our only ethics principle.
  2. Give practical, work-related examples of each of the six problems.
  3. What does an ethical person need, in addition to the Golden Rule?
  4. What is “diminished moral capacity”? Who has it, and with what result?
  5. Describe the Milgram, Zimbardo, and “blue eyes” experiments and briefly discuss their results. What do these studies have in common? What does this have to do with the Golden Rule?
  6. What do people need in order to be free moral agents, and why?
  7. Identify and discuss one problem with the Golden Rule that is not included in this chapter.

Assignment 9.1: The Golden Rule and You

Describe a recent situation where you used the Golden Rule to guide your own behavior.

Now describe a situation where you could not, or should not, use the Golden Rule to guide your behavior:

 

Assignment 9.2: The Golden Rule and Kant

Consider the examples you and your classmates brought to discussion from Assignment 9.1.  Choose one that can be analyzed from the perspective of universalizability, reversibility, respect, and ‘act as if,’ and work through an analysis of the principle that was used in the situation.

 

Assignment 9.3: What the Other Person Wants

Think of another example of an ethics situation that cannot be properly addressed with the Golden Rule because of the issue posed in Question 2.

 

Assignment 9.4: Wanting What Is Right

Think of another example of an ethics situation that cannot be properly addressed with the Golden Rule because of the issue posed in Question 3.

 

Assignment 9.5: Diminished Capacity

Have you ever known anyone who suffered from ‘diminished capacity’?  How did that person’s response to ethical situations differ from your own?

 

Assignment 9.6: Find Out More

Go on-line and check out summaries of the Milgram, Zimbardo, and ‘blue eyes’ experiments.  What do the results have in common?  What do they tell us about life in organizations?

 

Assignment 9.7: Justice and the Golden Rule

What is it, exactly, about the Golden Rule that makes it inappropriate or ineffective when we are primarily concerned with justice?

 

Assignment 9.8: Discussion on Golden Rule Failures

Break into small groups.  In each group, share an experience or two where the Golden Rule failed you, and talk about what else you needed in that situation to make a solid ethical choice.  Keep notes to see if you can add to the content of this chapter.

 
CHAPTER 10: Test Yourself
  1. Who is Dennis Kozlowski, and why is he prominent in this chapter?
  2. What are the three forms of egoism discussed in the chapter, and how are they different from one another?
  3. There are also three types of ethical egoism.  What are they, and how are they defined?
  4. What is the core philosophy of Ayn Rand’s “objectivism”?
  5. What is altruism?  How does it compare to egoism?
  6. What does egoism have to do with capitalism?
  7. What are the arguments for and against egoism?  How do you assess these arguments?
  8. What is the difference between egoism and self-interest?
  9. Why is pay-for-performance an issue in executive compensation?
  10. Why are honesty and disclosure issues in executive compensation?
  11. Why is ratio fairness an issue in executive compensation?
  12. In your own view, what is the relationship, if any, between egoism and executive compensation issues? 

Assignment 10.1: Selfishness and Self-Interest

1.  Can you imagine a self-interested act that would not be defined as selfish?

2.  Do you find this act morally objectionable? Explain.

3.  Now, think of an act that you define as selfish.

4.  Do you find this act morally objectionable?  Explain.

 

Assignment 10.2: Ethical and Psychological Egoism

Test the idea that ethical egoism and psychological egoism are logically inconsistent.  That is, see if you can think of a counter-example that disproves the claim.  Next, test each of the rationales given for ethical egoism and see if they are logically defensible.  NOTE: “Testing” as used here means exercising your skills in logic to see if ideas fit together rationally, or if evidence can be thought of to disconfirm the claims made.

 

Assignment 10.3: Acting Entirely for Others? 

What act can you think of that seems entirely altruistic?

 
Now:  Can you refute your own claim by showing how that act might indeed be self-interested instead?
 
How do you feel about this?  That is, if you can always show that a so-called altruistic act is really self-interested, is that OK with you or not?  Why?
 
Find someone who seems to have a job that requires great risk and sacrifice on behalf of others—a firefighter, police officer, emergency medical technician, or nurse, perhaps.  Ask this person, “Why do you have the job you do?”  Keep questioning until you get an answer to your real question – are they in it for themselves, or to help others, or both?
 

Assignment 10.4: Think About Friends….answer these questions and bring them to class for discussion.

Do you have any friends or acquaintances who act like ethical egoists?  Which of the three types are they?

Does this present any special problems or issues in your relationship with them?

Can an ethical egoist be a good friend? Why or why not?

 
Assignment 10:5: Pay-for-Performance

(Your instructor may ask you to do this assignment in small groups, or may assign you a particular set of companies to research.)

 

Look up the current list of top CEO earners in Forbes magazine.  If your instructor doesn’t assign companies to you, choose a small set to work with – perhaps the top 5 and the bottom 5, or 10 in the middle somewhere.  Now go on-line and research the performance of these companies compared to CEO compensation.  You’ll want to know, for example, how each company ranks in its industry, what its long-term stock performance has been, and whether there have been any special events (mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, criminal proceedings, fines, etc.) that should be taken into account.  You’ll want to know how the CEO’s one-year pay fits with a pattern, so look up the long-term figures as well as the year in question.  Distinguish among the various forms of compensation, too: Is a CEO’s high pay one year due to exercising stock options? See if you can find a link between CEO pay and company financial performance, and bring your data to class for discussion.

 
CHAPTER 11: Test Yourself 
  1. What is the guiding question of virtue ethics, and how is this question different from other guiding questions that an ethical theory might ask?
  2. Name and define the three core concepts of virtue ethics. 
  3. Explain the difference, in Aristotelian virtue ethics, between evil, incontinent, continent, and temperate people.
  4. What are the “practical virtues,” and what do they have to do with the Golden Mean?
  5. Explain why virtue ethics is not just a form of egoism. 
  6. Desjardins favors virtue ethics over what he calls rule-based ethics as a basis for ethics in business. Why?
  7. Solomon also defends virtue as a basis for ethics in business.  What is his rationale?
  8. What is the relationship between virtue ethics and corporate-community relations?
  9. What are the primary forms of corporate-community interactions discussed in the chapter?
  10. Many companies encourage their managers to serve on nonprofit boards of directors.  Why is this so?
  11. Describe and give an example of at least three popular forms of employee voluntarism.
  12. Recall that economist Milton Friedman believed that corporate philanthropy, if not directly approved by shareholders, was an unauthorized use of their money.  What do you learn in this chapter to counter that argument?
  13. What is cause-related marketing? 

Assignment 11.1: The Golden Mean

Check out the examples given below, applying character traits to various attitudes one can have, and then fill in the empty boxes to analyze what Aristotle meant by the “Golden Mean.”

 

Attitude toward:

Excess

Golden Mean

Deficiency

Oneself

 

 

Arrogance, conceit, vanity

Proper pride, self-respect

Servility, self-deprecation

Others’ offenses

 

 

Revenge, grudge, resentment

Anger, forgiveness, understanding

Doormat; ignoring offenses

Friends

 

 

Obsequiousness

 

Loyalty

Indifference

Others’ suffering

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Danger and death

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

People in general

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment 11.2: Virtuous Corporations and Stakeholders

What do you think a “virtuous corporation” might do in its relationships with stakeholders?  Use the table provided to think through some ideas, using the Golden Mean as your point of reference. 

 

The company’s attitude & behavior toward:

Excess

Golden Mean

Deficiency

Stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Employees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suppliers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Local Communities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment 11.3: Cause-Related Marketing

Do a stakeholder analysis for cause-related marketing and try to determine the costs (or harms) and benefits for each affected party.  On balance, do you think cause-related marketing is a good idea?  Why or why not?

 

WHO?

BENEFITS OF CRM?

COSTS/HARMS OF CRM?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
CHAPTER 12: Test Yourself
  1. What is the central principle of utilitarian thinking?
  2. How do classical utilitarians like Bentham and Mill define “good”?  (And, by the way, do Bentham and Mill use different definitions of what is good?)
  3. What’s the basic difference between a consequentialist and a deontological approach to ethics?
  4. How would you respond to the challenge that utilitarianism is just a way of declaring that the ends justify the means?
  5. Describe the utilitarian reasoning process and give an example of how it works.
  6. Identify and explain the major problems with utilitarian thinking.
  7. What additional constraints have been placed on classical utilitarianism by modern thinkers? 
Assignment 12.1: Examples of Utilitarianism
Now you’ve seen one example – the Oliver North testimony; search for and record here another example of a utilitarian justification for behavior.  Be sure to accurately record the source of your example.

 
Assignment 12.2: Your Job Choice: Utilitarian Reasoning for a Job Decision

As best you can, use the utilitarian reasoning process to examine your job choices after graduation.  What are your options?  Who will be affected by your decision?  How will those people be harmed or benefited – what happiness or pain will they experience – because of your decision?  (Don’t forget about certainty, intensity, duration, fecundity, nearness, purity, extent.)  What’s the best (most moral) choice for you to make, according to the utilitarian principle?

  1. What are your options?
  2. Who will be affected by your decision?
  3. How will those people be harmed or benefited – what happiness or pain will they experience – because of your decision?  (Don’t forget about certainty, intensity, duration, fecundity, nearness, purity, extent.)
  4. What’s the best (most moral) choice for you to make, according to the utilitarian principle?
 
 
Assignment 12.3: The Portmore Quiz

Professor Douglas Portmore of the University of California at Santa Barbara has constructed an on-line quiz that asks you to judge whether a statement is true, according to classical utilitarianism. [1]   Take the quiz, and then check on-line for Professor Portmore’s explanations.  The site is noted in the footnote below.

 

1.  According to utilitarianism, an act is morally wrong if it causes someone great unhappiness.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

2. According to utilitarianism, it is wrong to listen to the radio at full volume if this only makes you happy and everyone else in your building unhappy.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

3. According to utilitarianism, it is morally permissible to torture an innocent baby in certain circumstances.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.
 

4. According to utilitarianism, if the amount of pleasure a sadist would get from torturing an innocent baby is greater than the amount of pain he would cause by torturing the baby, then, other things being equal, he should torture the baby.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

 
5. According to utilitarianism, if instead of sending a check for a hundred dollars to Oxfam I purchase a hundred lottery tickets and mail them to Oxfam, I have done the wrong thing.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

6. According to utilitarianism, if an act produces happiness for many and unhappiness for no one, then it isn't an immoral act.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

 
7. Mr. Smith diverts a run-away train onto a spur track on which Bill has been tied. He diverts the train with the intention of saving five lives -- he believes that there are five other people tied to the tracks straight ahead but he is mistaken. Mr. Jones diverts a run-away train onto a spur track on which Ted has been tied. His intention is to kill Ted -- he enjoys killing people. He knows that there is no one tied to the tracks straight ahead.  According to utilitarianism, what Mr. Smith did was just as immoral as what Mr. Jones did.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

 
8. According to utilitarianism, we need to be concerned with what could happen thousands of years from now when deciding how we should store nuclear waste.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

9. According to utilitarianism, if you promised a kid ten bucks to wash your car and he did so, you should give him the ten bucks.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

 
10. Mr. Smith has thrown a one-year-old baby into the ocean in order to kill it. Mr. Jones, an excellent swimmer, is nearby. If he acts fast, he can save the child. However, Mr. Jones doesn't want to get wet and so refrains from saving the child.  According to utilitarianism, Mr. Jones's behavior is morally on a par with Mr. Smith's behavior.

Necessarily True or Not Necessarily True?   Explain your answer.

 

Finally, make up your own example of a situation in which utilitiarian reasoning is applied, and provide a justification for your answer that what you describe is necessarily true or not necessarily true, according to classical utilitarianism.

 

Your situation:

Your explanation:


[1] This quiz on utilitarianism was written by Douglas W. Portmore (portmore@humanitas.ucsb.edu), last modified: October 4, 1997.  Accessed 5-15-05 at http://www.cofc.edu/~portmord/u1.htm.

CHAPTER 13: Test Yourself
  1. What does it mean to say that Kant “forged a path in philosophy between the two popular trends of purely deductive reasoning and purely experiential explanations of knowledge”?
  2. In Kant’s view, what is the difference between the good and the right?
  3. Explain the difference between hypothetical imperatives and categorical imperatives, using examples other than those in the chapter.
  4. State, explain in plain language, and illustrate the three formulations of the categorical imperative.
  5. Can you think of a time when you used Kant’s “act as if” formulation?  What does it mean, exactly?
  6. What are the four implications of the categorical imperative?  Why are they important?
  7. How can a company be considered a “moral community”?  What stands in the way of thinking of companies like this? 
Assignment 13.1: Translating Kant
Before we move into Kant’s views on ethics, we are going to examine this question of thinking for oneself by working through Kant’s sometimes difficult phrasing to discover the core ideas he conveys.  Our vehicle for this task is Kant’s short essay, “What Is Enlightenment?” As you read each paragraph of the essay below, take a few moments to write out the core idea(s) of that paragraph.  When you have finished the essay, write out the core argument.  Use your own words, not Kant’s! 

 

Immanuel Kant

An Answer to the Question: "What is Enlightenment?"[1]

Konigsberg in Prussia, 30th September, 1784

 

Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-incurred immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one's own understanding without the guidance of another. This immaturity is self-incurred if its cause is not lack of understanding, but lack of resolution and courage to use it without the guidance of another. The motto of enlightenment is therefore: Sapere aude! Have courage to use your own understanding!


Laziness and cowardice are the reasons why such a large proportion of men, even when nature has long emancipated them from alien guidance (naturaliter maiorennes), nevertheless gladly remain immature for life. For the same reasons, it is all too easy for others to set themselves up as their guardians. It is so convenient to be immature! If I have a book to have understanding in place of me, a spiritual adviser to have a conscience for me, a doctor to judge my diet for me, and so on, I need not make any efforts at all. I need not think, so long as I can pay; others will soon enough take the tiresome job over for me. The guardians who have kindly taken upon themselves the work of supervision will soon see to it that by far the largest part of mankind (including the entire fair sex) should consider the step forward to maturity not only as difficult but also as highly dangerous. Having first infatuated their domesticated animals, and carefully prevented the docile creatures from daring to take a single step without the leading-strings to which they are tied, they next show them the danger which threatens them if they try to walk unaided. Now this danger is not in fact so very great, for they would certainly learn to walk eventually after a few falls. But an example of this kind is intimidating, and usually frightens them off from further attempts.

 

Thus it is difficult for each separate individual to work his way out of the immaturity which has become almost second nature to him. He has even grown fond of it and is really incapable for the time being of using his own understanding, because he was never allowed to make the attempt. Dogmas and formulas, those mechanical instruments for rational use (or rather misuse) of his natural endowments, are the ball and chain of his permanent immaturity. And if anyone did throw them off, he would still be uncertain about jumping over even the narrowest of trenches, for he would be unaccustomed to free movement of this kind. Thus only a few, by cultivating their own minds, have succeeded in freeing themselves from immaturity and in continuing boldly on their way.

There is more chance of an entire public enlightening itself. This is indeed almost inevitable, if only the public concerned is left in freedom. For there will always be a few who think for themselves, even among those appointed as guardians of the common mass. Such guardians, once they have themselves thrown off the yoke of immaturity, will disseminate the spirit of rational respect for personal value and for the duty of all men to think for themselves. The remarkable thing about this is that if the public, which was previously put under this yoke by the guardians, is suitably stirred up by some of the latter who are incapable of enlightenment, it may subsequently compel the guardians themselves to remain under the yoke. For it is very harmful to propagate prejudices, because they finally avenge themselves on the very people who first encouraged them (or whose predecessors did so). Thus a public can only achieve enlightenment slowly. A revolution may well put an end to autocratic despotism and to rapacious or power-seeking oppression, but it will never produce a true reform in ways of thinking. Instead, new prejudices, like the ones they replaced, will serve as a leash to control the great unthinking mass.

 
For enlightenment of this kind, all that is needed is freedom. And the freedom in question is the most innocuous form of all--freedom to make public use of one's reason in all matters. But I hear on all sides the cry: Don't argue! The officer says: Don't argue, get on parade! The tax-official: Don't argue, pay! The clergyman: Don't argue, believe! (Only one ruler in the world says: Argue as much as you like and about whatever you like, but obey!). . All this means restrictions on freedom everywhere. But which sort of restriction prevents enlightenment, and which, instead of hindering it, can actually promote it ? I reply: The public use of man's reason must always be free, and it alone can bring about enlightenment among men; the private use of reason may quite often be very narrowly restricted, however, without undue hindrance to the progress of enlightenment. But by the public use of one's own reason I mean that use which anyone may make of it as a man of learning addressing the entire reading public. What I term the private use of reason is that which a person may make of it in a particular civil post or office with which he is entrusted.
 
Now in some affairs which affect the interests of the commonwealth, we require a certain mechanism whereby some members of the commonwealth must behave purely passively, so that they may, by an artificial common agreement, be employed by the government for public ends (or at least deterred from vitiating them). It is, of course, impermissible to argue in such cases; obedience is imperative.

But in so far as this or that individual who acts as part of the machine also considers himself as a member of a complete commonwealth or even of cosmopolitan society, and thence as a man of learning who may through his writings address a public in the truest sense of the word, he may 'indeed argue without harming the affairs in which he is employed for some of the time in a passive capacity. Thus it would be very harmful if an officer receiving an order from his superiors were to quibble openly, while on duty, about the appropriateness or usefulness of the order in question. He must simply obey. But he cannot reasonably be banned from making observations as a man of learning on the errors in the military service, and from submitting these to his public for judgment. The citizen cannot refuse to pay the taxes imposed upon him; presumptuous criticisms of such taxes, where someone is called upon to pay them, may be punished as an outrage which could lead to general insubordination. Nonetheless, the same citizen does not contravene his civil obligations if, as a learned individual, he publicly voices his thoughts on the impropriety or even injustice of such fiscal measures. In the same way, a clergyman is bound to instruct his pupils and his congregation in accordance with the doctrines of the church he serves, for he was employed by it on that condition. But as a scholar, he is completely free as well as obliged to impart to the public all his carefully considered, well-intentioned thoughts on the mistaken aspects of those doctrines, and to offer suggestions for a better arrangement of religious and ecclesiastical affairs.

And there is nothing in this which need trouble the conscience. For what he teaches in pursuit of his duties as an active servant of the church is presented by him as something which he is not empowered to teach at his own discretion, but which he is employed to expound in a prescribed manner and in someone else's name. He will say: Our church teaches this or that, and these are the arguments it uses. He then extracts as much practical value as possible for his congregation from precepts to which he would not himself subscribe with full conviction, but which he can nevertheless undertake to expound, since it is not in fact wholly impossible that they may contain truth. At all events, nothing opposed to the essence of religion is present in such doctrines. For if the clergyman thought he could find anything of this sort in them, he would not be able to carry out his official duties in good conscience, and would have to resign. Thus the use which someone employed as a teacher makes of his reason in the presence of his congregation is purely private, since a congregation, however large it is, is never any more than a domestic gathering. In view of this, he is not and cannot be free as a priest, since he is acting on a commission imposed from outside. Conversely, as a scholar addressing the real public (i.e. the world at large) through his writings, the clergyman making public use of his reason enjoys unlimited freedom to use his own reason and to speak in his own person. For to maintain that the guardians of the people in spiritual matters should themselves be immature, is an absurdity which amounts to making absurdities permanent.

But should not a society of clergymen, for example an ecclesiastical synod or a venerable presbytery (as the Dutch call it), be entitled to commit itself by oath to a certain unalterable set of doctrines, in order to secure for all time a constant guardianship over each of its members, and through them over the people ? I reply that this is quite impossible. A contract of this kind, concluded with a view to preventing all further enlightenment of mankind for ever, is absolutely null and void, even if it is ratified by the supreme power, by Imperial Diets and the most solemn peace treaties. One age cannot enter into an alliance on oath to put the next age in a position where it would be impossible for it to extend and correct its knowledge, particularly on such important matters, or to make any progress whatsoever in enlightenment. This would be a crime against human nature, whose original destiny lies precisely in such progress. Later generations are thus perfectly entitled to dismiss these agreements as unauthorised and criminal.

 
To test whether any particular measure can be agreed upon as a law for a people, we need only ask whether a people could well impose such a law upon itself. This might well be possible for a specified short period as a means of introducing a certain order, pending, as it were, a better solution. This would also mean that each citizen, particularly the clergyman, would be given a free hand as a scholar to comment publicly, i.e. in his writings, on the inadequacies of current institutions. Meanwhile, the newly established order would continue to exist, until public insight into the nature of such matters had progressed and proved itself to the point where, by general consent (if not unanimously), a proposal could be submitted to the crown. This would seek to protect the congregations who had, for instance, agreed to alter their religious establishment in accordance with their own notions of what higher insight is, but it would not try to obstruct those who wanted to let things remain as before. But it is absolutely impermissible to agree, even for a single lifetime, to a permanent religious constitution which no-one might publicly question. For this would virtually nullify a phase in man's upward progress, thus making it fruitless and even detrimental to subsequent generations. A man may for his own person, and even then only for a limited period, postpone enlightening himself in matters he ought to know about. But to renounce such enlightenment completely, whether for his own person or even more so for later generations, means violating and trampling underfoot the sacred rights of mankind.
 
But something which a people may not even impose upon itself can still less be imposed upon it by a monarch; for his legislative authority depends precisely upon his uniting the collective will of the people in his own. So long as he sees to it that all true or imagined improvements are compatible with the civil order, he can otherwise leave his subjects to do whatever they find necessary for their salvation, which is none of his business. But it is his business to stop anyone forcibly hindering others from working as best they can to define and promote their salvation. It indeed detracts from his majesty if he interferes in these affairs by subjecting the writings in which his subjects attempt to clarify their religious ideas to governmental supervision. This applies if he does so acting upon his own exalted opinions-- in which case he exposes himself to the reproach: Caesar non est supra Grammaticos--but much more so if he demeans his high authority so far as to support the spiritual despotism of a few tyrants within his state against the rest of his subjects.

If it is now asked whether we at present live in an enlightened age, the answer is: No, but we do live in an age of enlightenment. As things are at present, we still have a long way to go before men as a whole can be in a position (or can ever be put into a position) of using their own understanding confidently and well in religious matters, without outside guidance. But we do have distinct indications that the way is now being cleared for them to work freely in this direction, and that the obstacles to universal enlightenment, to man's emergence from his self-incurred immaturity, are gradually becoming fewer. In this respect our age is the age of enlightenment, the century of Frederick.

A prince who does not regard it as beneath him to say that he considers it his duty, in religious matters, not to prescribe anything to his people, but to allow them complete freedom, a prince who thus even declines to accept the presumptuous title of tolerant, is himself enlightened. He deserves to be praised by a grateful present and posterity as the man who first liberated mankind from immaturity (as far as government is concerned), and who left all men free to use their own reason in all matters of conscience. Under his rule, ecclesiastical dignitaries, notwithstanding their official duties, may in their capacity as scholars freely and publicly submit to the judgment of the world their verdicts and opinions, even if these deviate here and there from orthodox doctrine. This applies even more to all others who are not restricted by any official duties. This spirit of freedom is also spreading abroad, even where it has to struggle with outward obstacles imposed by governments which misunderstand their own function. For such governments an now witness a shining example of how freedom may exist without in the least jeopardising public concord and the unity of the commonwealth. Men will of their own accord gradually work their way out of barbarism so long as artificial measures are not deliberately adopted to keep them in it. 

I have portrayed matters of religion as the focal point of enlightenment, i.e. of man's emergence from his self-incurred immaturity. This is firstly because our rulers have no interest in assuming the role of guardians over their subjects so fir as the arts and sciences are concerned, and secondly, because religious immaturity is the most pernicious and dishonourable variety of all. But the attitude of mind of a head of state who favours freedom in the arts and sciences extends even further, for he realises that there is no danger even to his legislation if he allows his subjects to make public use of their own reason and to put before the public their thoughts on better ways of drawing up laws, even if this entails forthright criticism of the current legislation. We have before us a brilliant example of this kind, in which no monarch has yet surpassed the one to whom we now pay tribute.

But only a ruler who is himself enlightened and has no far of phantoms, yet who likewise has at hand a well-disciplined and numerous army to guarantee public security, may say what no republic would dare to say: Argue as much as you like and about whatever you like, but obey! This reveals to us a strange and unexpected pattern in human affairs (such as we shall always find if we consider them in the widest sense, in which nearly everything is paradoxical). A high degree of civil freedom seems advantageous to a people's intellectual freedom, yet it also sets up insuperable barriers to it. Conversely, a lesser degree of civil freedom gives intellectual freedom enough room to expand to its fullest extent. Thus once the germ on which nature has lavished most care--man's inclination and vocation to think freely--has developed within this hard shell, it gradually reacts upon the mentality of the people, who thus gradually become increasingly able to act freely. Eventually, it even influences the principles of governments, which find that they can themselves profit by treating man, who is more than a machine, in a manner appropriate to his dignity.

 
FINAL THOUGHTS:

What is the core argument Kant is making here?

 
Assignment 13.2: The First Formulation 

Write down another example of a self-defeating principle if applied universally.  Then try to come up with a principle that is not self-defeating if applied universally, and be prepared to present and defend your choices in class.

 

Assignment 13.3: The Second Formulation
What are some of the ways that teachers can show disrespect to students?  What are some of the ways that students can show disrespect to teachers?
 

Teachers can treat students like this:

     Students can treat teachers like this:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment 13.4: The Third Formulation
Below, list and define the four implications of Kant’s categorical imperative.  Use the terms from your text, but define each one in language that makes sense and speaks to you.
 

Assignment 13.5: The Firm as a Moral Community
Most of us are familiar with the idea of a firm as a bundle of contracts, or as an organization intended to fulfill certain human or social purposes, or as an entity intended to maximize value for shareholders.  These are the images put forth in other business classes, and they are exceedingly common in capitalist cultures.  But – how can we think of a firm as a moral community?  Find another example of unethical conduct in a business organization and examine it using the categorical imperative.

 
CHAPTER 14: Test Yourself
  1. What’s the difference between negative rights and positive rights?  Briefly define and give an example of each.
  2. What did Hannah Arendt mean when she said that “stateless peoples have no rights?”
  3. In general, what are duties?  Briefly define and give an example of the types of duties discussed in this chapter.
  4. What’s the difference between legal and moral rights?
  5. Distinguish among civil/political, social welfare, and human rights with definitions and examples.
  6. Name at least eight of the rights incorporated into the United States Consitition’s first ten amendments.
  7. Briefly recap the history of the United Nations with respect to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
  8. The UDHR contains a number of negative and positive rights.  What do you think the role of business is in ensuring that these rights are sustained?
  9. At your school, what rights and duties do students have?  What about professors?

Assignment 14.1: Living Without Rights
Go ahead, imagine.  What rights do you have that you never want to give up?  What would life be like without each of them?

 

Assignment 14.2: Perfect and Imperfect Duties
Let’s say that you’re hard at work one day, when you happen to overhear a conversation between the company controller and his secretary.  They’re using very low voices, almost whispering.  He says, “Did you shred the documents yet?”  She says, “Not yet, I’ll do it after lunch.”  He says, “Better not wait; the auditors will be here soon.”

 

Do you have any duty here?  If so, to whom or to what?  Is it a perfect or imperfect duty?  If not, why do you think so?

 
Assignment 14.3: Rights Under Apartheid
If you don’t know anything about apartheid South Africa, google the phrase and jot down what you glean from your research. Pay special attention to issues of rights in what you find.  Be sure to record your sources.
 
Assignment 14.4: Find Out More: Locke on Private Property
The full text of John Locke’s central defense of private property can be found at the University of Chicago Press’s website, http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s3.html.  You’ll be reading from Locke’s Second Treatise on Government, Chapter V, sections 25-51 and 123-126.  Work your way through this text (even more cumbersome than reading Kant!), and be sure you can answer these questions:

  1. What is the role of nature in Locke’s defense of private property?
  2. On what does Locke base his contention that private property is both essential and right?  (Think “acorns” here, and lay out the core idea.)
  3. What is the proper role of government, according to Locke?
  4. Do you think Locke would be an advocate of unrestrained greed?

Assignment 14.5: The U.S. Bill of Rights
In the figure below is the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution and the foundation for what many consider to be basic civil and political rights. How many rights are incorporated in these amendments?  Are they positive or negative rights?  Can you spot any significant rights that are NOT included?
 
Assignment 14.6: Why Are Rights Important?
Why do you think that rights like the ones in Donaldson’s list of “moral minimums for multinationals” are believed to be so important for human beings?
 
Assignment 14.7: Rights in International Business
Multinational companies sometimes find them-selves trying to operate in countries that do not guarantee or protect basic human rights.  Revisit Donaldson’s list of basic rights, and then think of some situations in which businesses would be violating those rights:
 
Assignment 14.8: Company Codes and the UDHR
Search the web for company codes of conduct or values statements that reference the UDHR.  List company names and web addresses here, and be prepared to report on what you discover.

 

Assignment 14.9: Negative and Positive Rights in the UDHR
To help you remember the basic content of the UDHR, make yourself a very abbreviated, shorthand list of the rights included.  Distinguish between negative rights and positive rights.
 

NEGATIVE RIGHTS

POSITIVE RIGHTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any surprises here?

 
Assignment 14.10: Rights and Duties at Your School
All schools have statements and/or policies about the rights and duties of students.  It’s a good idea for you to know what those statements and policies are, so look them up, and take some notes on what you find.

 

You may be surprised to learn that your professors also have rights and duties that are spelled out in college or university policy.  Your school’s website should also give you some idea of what those rights and duties are.  Add to your notes.

 

Student Rights

Student Duties

Professor Rights

Professor Duties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
CHAPTER 15: Test Yourself
  1. What are some of the meanings that work holds for people?  Do you think these meanings change as one’s life circumstances change?
  2. What is the idea of the wage-labor contract?  How does it stack up ethically?
  3. What are the pros and cons of a legally mandated minimum wage?
  4. What is the “living wage”?  How does it compare to minimum wage?
  5. What benefits are federally mandated for U.S. employees?  What benefits are commonly provided, though not required by law?
  6. What are the primary the functions of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration?
  7. What are the primary the functions of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission?
  8. What is the difference between non-discrimination and affirmative action?
  9. What is the actual intent of affirmative action programs?
  10. What is sexual harassment?  What should companies do about it?

Assignment 15.1: The Meaning of Your Work

Think about your current – or last – job.  What did it mean to you?  Why did you get up every morning and go to it, or spend your evenings or weekends doing it?  What made you stay with that job?  How do you think you behaved on the job, because of the way you felt about it?

 

Assignment 15.2: What Is a Living Wage?

Let’s do the math.  First, calculate the weekly gross income of a person working 34 hours a week (just one hour short of full-time, when benefits would have to be paid) at $5.15 an hour.  Then take out taxes – which could be as much as 15 percent, depending on state and local tax rates.

 

Now calculate your living expenses, including housing, utilities, telephones (land lines, cell, VOIP), cable and internet connections, transportation, medical and dental, clothing and shoes, household maintenance, food, entertainment, tuition, books, and school supplies.

 

Can you make it on minimum wage?  Do you have additional sources of income – say, college loans, parental assistance, and roommates?  Would you be able to make it if you were supporting a disabled spouse?  What if you had a child or two?

 

Net income:

 

Your budget:

 

Category

Monthly expense

Housing

 

Utilities

 

Telephones

 

Cable and internet

 

Transportation

 

Medical and dental

 

Clothing, shoes, personal care (haircuts, etc.)

 

Household maintenance

 

Food

 

Tuition

 

Books and supplies

 

Other

 

Other

 

Other

 

                                            TOTAL

 

 

Assignment 15.3: Your Experiences with Workplace Ethics Issues
Again, think about your current – or last – job.  Write up an example of unethical conduct in your workplace, focusing on one of the topics in the remainder of this chapter – health and safety, equal opportunity, sexual harassment, substance abuse, theft, or violence.  Be prepared to present and discuss your case in class.
 

Assignment 15.4: Companies and Workplace Safety and Health
Find one example of a company that emphasizes worker safety and health in its values, policies, and practices.  Then find one example of a company that apparently violates worker health and safety rules repeatedly.  Bring your examples to present to the class.
 

Assignment 15.5: Additional Workplace Ethics Issues
Find and bring to class for discussion one example of a workplace ethics issue involving health and safety, discrimination, wages and benefits, theft, sabotage, sexual harassment, violence, privacy, substance abuse, or any other issue not covered in the chapter.
 
 
CHAPTER 16: Test Yourself
  1. In your own words, briefly explain the idea that virtue isn’t enough to ensure an ethical organization.
  2. Explain the concepts of “negligent hiring” and “due diligence standard.”
  3. Why is it important for companies to align their structures and processes with their values?  Give an example where misalignment can cause ethical trouble.
  4. Briefly discuss the role of incentives in organizational ethics.
  5. What are management control systems?  Why do they matter to organizational ethics?
  6. What does the U.S. Sentencing Commission do, and why?
  7. Explain why the 1991 Sentencing Guidelines were a powerful factor in organizational ethics.
  8. What is “an effective program to prevent and detect violations of law”?
  9. If you wanted to begin such a program, how would you do it?
  10. List some of the key provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
  11. How did the 2004 Sentencing Guidelines change the landscape for corporate ethics?
  12. Compare the corporate programs outlined in the 1991 and 2004 Sentencing Guidelines.
  13. Why is corporate governance such a hot topic these days?
  14. List several of the current issues in corporate governance.

Assignment 16.1: Barriers and Facilitators at Your Workplace

As you review the facilitators and barriers in the table, keep in mind any organizations that you have worked for in the past, or perhaps your current employer.  Can you identify any of these factors at work in organizations you have known?

 

Assignment 16.2: Does Your On-Line Presence Match Your Desired Image?
There’s a half-nude photo of him/her, grinning and slouching precariously against a mound of beer cans as she/he raises a frosty mug in a salute to the viewer.  The profile reads like this:

  

    Favorite activity: sex, sex, sex

    Best friend: current sex partner

    Favorite pet: current sex partner

    Favorite position: whatever

    Favorite beverage: ice cold, and keep ‘em coming

    Favorite controlled substance:  nose candy

    Favorite class:  class?

    Contact: pootitooti@xxx.edu

 

Take a hard look at your e-mail address. Check your listings on sites like FaceBook.com and MySpace.com. Google your own name and check out every site where there’s a hit. What’s the image that appears?  Write down your on-line profile as a prospective employer would see it. Do you look like a person that a reputable company would want to hire?

 

Now double-check your own judgment on this.  Print your pages and bring them to share with the class.  Still OK with it?

 

Assignment 16.3: Filling in the Blanks

What factors, and accompanying facilitators and barriers, are missing from this discussion?  For example, what do you think the role of organizational size is?  How about ownership structure?  Turbulence?  Other things?  Add factors in a table of your own, and be prepared to discuss the consequences of each.

 

Assignment 16.4: 2004 Sentencing Guidelines

Extract and summarize in your own words the key components of an effective compliance and ethics program, according to Section 8B2.1 of the 2004 Sentencing Guidelines.  Now compare these components to the 1991 Sentencing Guidelines’ requirements for an effective program to prevent and deter violations of law.  What is different?

 

Assignment 16.5: More on Corporate Governance

Check on-line and in the business press to discover what the current issues are in corporate governance.  Choose one issue, and learn something more about it.  Why is this an issue?  Who’s raising it?  What is happening with the issue?  Be prepared to report your findings in class.

 
CHAPTER 17: Test Yourself
  1. How is the concept of ethics, and in particular fairness, based in primitive exchange relationships?
  2. Six forms of justice, largely based on context, are defined early in the chapter.  Name them, and use your own words to define them.
  3. Explain why justice involves fairness to everyone and to the individual.
  4. Explain why the two additional dimensions of justice -- fairness of access and of outcome -- are essential.
  5. What are the criteria for judging a social, organizational, or institutional process to be fair?
  6. Explain the concept of “relevant differences” as it applies to justice, using an illustration that is not in the text chapter.
  7. Why is it more difficult to judge fair outcomes than it is to judge fair processes?
  8. Identify and define the major values associated with assessing fair outcomes.
  9. What does Michael Walzer mean by his term "complex equality"?  Think of an example that isn't in the chapter.
  10. Explain why markets cannot, by most definitions, guarantee justice.
  11. How would you phrase a short explanation of the requirements of justice, without using the circular definition, “it’s fair”?
  12. What is ethical relativism?
  13. What is your ‘bottom line’ on accepting whatever other cultures consider to be ethical?
  14. What are the advantages of ethical relativism?
  15. What are the arguments against ethical relativism?
  16. Which do you find most compelling – arguments for or against ethical relativism?  Why?
  17. What does ethical pluralism mean, and what does it offer to global managers?
Assignment 17.1: Cave-People Exchange, Ethics, and Justice
Trace out additional implications of this long-ago story.  For example, what if I take your veggies and refuse to give you any meat?  Or vice versa?  What if one of us makes a better deal with the neighbor down river and leaves the other hanging as winter’s coming on?    What if one of us has a bad hunting or foraging year?  And so on.  Now, given such consequences and contingencies, why do you suppose that basic exchange and contracting would be a matter of ethics?
 

Assignment 17.2: Interviews and Process Justice

How does your school organize and handle job fairs, career days, and on-campus interviews?  If you don’t know, find out.  Then think and write about whether you consider the process to be fair or not, and why.

 
Assignment 17.3: Behind the Veil of Ignorance
In teams, in class or outside, as your instructor determines, do this exercise and write up the results for class discussion.

 

Your team is stranded on an island with absolutely no hope of rescue.  The plane crash left you all with total amnesia.  You all know that you must build yourself a community, but you have no idea who can contribute what, who comes from which background or status, even who is male or female.  And, even if you could remember any of that, you wouldn’t know what it meant in terms of how your society organizes itself and distributes benefits and burdens.

 

Discuss among yourselves, under these conditions, the rules, or principles, that you would agree to be governed by in your new society.

 
 
CHAPTER 18: Test Yourself
  1. What does globalization mean?
  2. Why are there so many ethical issues in globalization?
  3. Job displacement and wage rates are hot-button issues in globalization.  Why?
  4. What does “living wage” mean?
  5. What is a sweatshop, and how would you identify one?
  6. What are the steps that companies take to avoid sweatshops and similar labor problems in their supply chains?  Describe the related efforts of at least one global company.
  7. Why is child labor such an issue in the globalizing economy?
  8. What is forced labor, and why is it an issue?  What are some examples of forced labor?
  9. Why is HIV/AIDS such an important concern for many global companies?
  10. What are some other health threats that face global companies in developing nations, and why are they important?
  11. When people talk of a “race to the bottom” in globalization, what are they talking about?
  12. The example of banking regulation tells us what about globalization and the search for lower regulatory standards?
  13. Explain why environmental degradation is considered to be a serious issue in the globalizing economy.
  14. What are intellectual property rights?  What are the main types of such rights?  Why is IP an important issue in globalization?
  15. What is bribery?  What is corruption?
  16. How do you think businesspeople feel about paying bribes to corrupt government officials?
  17. What are the major impact areas of bribery and corruption?
  18. What is the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and what does it do?

Assignment 18.1: Investigate the IMF’s Issue Brief on Globalization

The International Monetary Fund’s 2000 issue brief, “Globalization: Threat or Opportunity?” offers an excellent overview of the economic, political, and social bumps along the road to a fully globalized economy.  To gain more in-depth knowledge about the issues of globalization, read this report at http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/041200.htm, and take a few notes for yourself and for class discussion.

 

Assignment 18.2: Tracking Dislocated/Displaced Workers

Go to your hometown news source and find an important incidence of job loss – a factory or a grocery store chain moving out of the area, a large bankruptcy, or simply a severe economic downturn.  What was the buzz surrounding the event you found?  Is there any evidence that the displaced workers were able to find good replacement jobs?  Did they leave the community, or go back to school, or enter training programs?  What was the impact on the larger community?

 

Assignment 18.3: Nike's Social Reports
Nike’s social reports cannot be found from their core website, www.nike.com, unless you know the entire address.  So, here’s the page for their “Workers & Factories” section: http://www.nike.com/nikebiz/nikebiz.jhtml?page=25, and from there you can click on a link to their 2004 social report.  Go ahead, find the social report and download it.  Surf around in the report and take some notes on what interests or surprises you about what you find.

Then, check out the history of the Kasky lawsuit against Nike.  An overview can be found at http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/ 09/13/BU47505.DTL&type=business.  What does this tell you?

 

Assignment 18.4: Stopping Sweatshops

Find the website for the “No Sweat” campaign, which advocates that college students demand that their universities not use sweatshop labor to produce athletic and branded gear and clothing.  Find out if there is a “No Sweat” movement on your campus.

 

Assignment 18.5: The Faces of Child Labor

The website of the International Labour Organisation (ILO), at http://www.ilo.org/, offers a short video (less than 3 minutes) on child labor.  Watch this video, and then check out what some of the world’s NGOs have to say about child labor.  Global Exchange, Human Rights Watch, UNICEF, and ILO are just a few of the groups tracking and working to end child labor.  Make some notes for class discussion.

 

Assignment 18.6: Learn More About AngloGold Ashanti’s Approach to HIV/AIDS

The website of AngloGoldAshanti, Ltd., at www.anglogold.com, has links to the company’s agreement with its trade unions and associations on an HIV/AIDS policy, as well as annual social reports that update the status of the company’s programs and practices.  Check out these documents and construct a time-and-events table to trace the company’s progress.

 
 
CHAPTER 19: Test Yourself
  1. What is a global business citizen?
  2. What are some of the threats to sustainable capitalism?
  3. What does capitalism require in order to be sustainable?
  4. What does “a race to the bottom” mean in terms of globalization of economic activity?
  5. Why would businesses want to self-regulate?  Is self-regulation a reasonable idea, in your opinion?
  6. How can a business be considered as a citizen?
  7. What’s the relationship between business citizen status and the political theories of minimalism, communitarianism, and universalism?
  8. Explain the two variables in the GBC model—ethical certainty and global strategy.
  9. Convince yourself that the cells in the GBC matrix are defined accurately.  If you think otherwise, prepare an argument.
  10. Why are ethical relativism and ethical imperialism called “logical inconsistencies” in the GBC model?
  11. What are the four steps of the GBC process?

Assignment 19.1: Government Corruption

Check out the website of Transparency International at www.transparency.org.  Go first to the “FAQs on corruption” to see how corruption is defined, what its consequences are, and some common misperceptions about it.

 

Now look at the annual Corruption Perceptions Index.  What are the ten most corrupt nations in the world at present?  What are the ten least corrupt?  Where does the United States stand?

 

Finally, browse around the site to learn how companies can fight corruption in the places where they do business.

 

Assignment 19.2: Self-Regulation

Find some specific examples of how businesses and industries self-regulate.  Be prepared to explain to the class how self-regulation works in the examples you have chosen.

 

Assignment 19.3: Universal Principles

We visited the idea of universal principles in our chapters on values and on the Golden Rule.  Go back and take another look at some of those principles.  Then find an example of a universal principle that can be implemented in more than one way without violating the principle.

 
 
CHAPTER 20: Test Yourself
  1. What’s the “short story” of the “green” engineer case?  What is the main point of the case?
  2. The Global Compact principles cover what four main areas of business practice?  Why do you think these areas are of the most interest?
  3. For each mini-case or vignette presented in the Global Compact section, decide which principle(s) is/are being addressed by the company’s program or practice.
  4. What is the main purpose of the Millenium Development Goals?
  5. What are some ways that businesses can contribute to achieving the Millenium Development Goals?
  6. What does the case of Aarhus United A/S in Burkina Faso tell you about the perils and opportunities of doing business in developing countries?
  7. Grameen Bank is an unusual organization in many ways.  Why do you think it has been so successful?

Assignment 20.1: Discussion Questions for Green Engineer (A)

  1. 1. Do you think Jody responded appropriately to Pat’s query?
  2. Do you think Pat is over-reacting?
 

Assignment 20.2: The Green Engineer’s Decision Tree

Pat’s analysis took the form of a decision tree, beginning with two choices: “Tell,” and “Don’t Tell.”  Starting here, draw out a decision tree, using consequences of each choice and subsequent decisions.

 

Assignment 20.3: Discussion Questions for Green Engineer (B)

  1. Companies in turbulent industries often search for any way possible to cut costs and remain competitive.  If this was what was happening at BreatheRite, how would this affect Pat’s decision tree?
  2. Do you think Pat’s professor responded appropriately?  Why or why not?  Was there anything else you think the professor should have brought up?
 

Assignment 20.4: Discussion Questions for Green Engineer (C)

  1. Why didn’t Pat know how his news would be received?
  2. Should the company make some changes so new employees don’t face this kind of stress in the future?  If so, what?  If not, why?
  3. What do you think about Charles’s response to Pat’s concerns?
 

Assignment 20.5: Discussion Questions for Green Engineer (D)

  1. Why do you think the BreatheRite board hadn’t paid attention to ethics training before the valve incident?
  2. If you were to write a values statement for BreatheRite, what would it say?
 

Assignment 20.6: Updating the GBC Anecdotes

The vignettes in this chapter are just short summaries of programs to implement ethics and social responsibility, and things have no doubt happened since this book was published.  Choose one, or take the one your instructor assigns you, and search for updated information.  The Global Compact website and the company’s own website will be helpful, but search also for additional information on the company’s program.

Assignment 20.7: Find Out More…About Best Practices Cases

These days there are a number of good sources for learning about corporate best practices in ethics and social responsibility.  Below are a few.  Check out the website your instructor assigns to you, and bring a best practices case to class for presentation and discussion.

 

·         Natural Resources Canada offers ten best practices case studies on corporate social responsibility.  The website address given gives you a preview of the cases; click on “Case Studies” in the lefthand box to reach the actual PDF downloads of the cases.  http://www.nrcan-rncan.gc.ca/sd-dd/csr-rse/bp_e.html.

·         Wheelhouse, a CSR consulting firm, offers case studies on Patagonia, Urban Splash, and a number of other companies that have implemented CSR best practices:  http://www.article13.com/A13_ContentList.asp?strCategory=Best%20Practice.

·         For a report on Business Ethics magazine’s “100 Best Corporate Citizens,” an article that will steer you to company websites and information,see http://www.business-ethics.com/100best.htm.

·         For the European Union’s “Green Paper on CSR” and links to relevant companies, see http://www.bsdglobal.com/issues/eu_green_paper.asp.

·         This site takes you to a quarterly newsletter, “Ethical Performance Best Practice,” with links to case studies in the lefthand box:  http://www.ethicalperformance.com/bestpractice/index.html. 

·         The United Nations Global Compact website, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/, gives you access to a wealth of CSR-related company information.  Start at this page, http://www.unglobalcompact.org/CommunicatingProgress/notable_cops.html, to access “Notable Communications on Progress” for dozens of companies worldwide.

·         CasePlace, a project of the Aspen Institute, at http://www.caseplace.org/, features many case studies in ethics, social responsibility, and environmental sustainability.

 
 
CHAPTER 21: Test Yourself
  1. If you’re on the job and you observe something that you believe to be unethical, what should you do?
  2. If your boss comes in one day and says, “OK, kid, now this is how things are done in the real world,” what should you do?
  3. Can you explain why it’s important to create a financial nest egg for yourself? 
  4. Can you explain how to create that nest egg?

Assignment 21.1: Documenting Your Work Life

Working alone or in small groups, as your instructor directs, list the types of things you believe should be kept in your off-site CYA file.  Bring the list to class for discussion of these (and other) questions:

 

·         Do you have a right to this information?  Do others have a right to it?  Who, and under what circumstances?

·         How will this document help you?

·         Is this document based on fact, opinion, or gossip?

 

As discussion proceeds, add to your own list those items that others have thought of.

 

Assignment 21.2: Who’s In Your Network?

Everyone has some sort of personal and professional network.  Who is in yours?  What can you expect from each relationship, and what do you give?  How much trust is there in each relationship, and what kind of trust is it (shallow or deep, love- or work-based, etc.)?  Who would you like to have in your network?  How could you go about adding those people to your network?

Assignment 21.3: Own Your Finances

Which description in this chapter best characterizes your financial picture?  After choosing, go through the exercises listed for your type – deep in debt already, or not.  Begin today to own your financial situation and work to improve it.

 

Do this exercise separately, as this information is very personal and confidential and your instructor is not likely to ask for it to be turned in. 

 

Do this just for you.

 

Assignment 21.4: Calculate Your IRA Returns

Let’s assume that you’re going to invest more than a trivial amount in your retirement fund, and that you’re going to start investing immediately.  To convince yourself that an IRA for a young-20s worker like you is a wonderful idea, do the calculations in the table.  OK – are you convinced?

 

On-line you can find numerous sites that will instantaneously calculate retirement values for you.  But this assignment is not about getting to some right answer.  Doing these calculations with a hand calculator, one year at a time, will hammer home the point that saving early and often is the only way to guarantee that you will have a financially secure retirement.

 

Here’s how to do the calculation in a way that will really convince you.

 

  1. Work with one column at a time.  The first column is “add $3,000 each year, earn 5% per year.”

 

  1. Enter 1.05 into your calculator’s memory.

 

  1. For year 1, enter 3000, then “times,” then “recall memory,” and enter that amount in the “Year-end total, 5%” cell for year 1.

 

  1. For year 2, enter “plus,” then “3000,” then “times, then “recall memory,” and enter that amount in the second cell down.

 

  1. See how this is working?  Each year you start with the last year’s total, add your $3,000, and multiply by 1 plus the rate of return, or 1.05.

 

  1. When you’ve finished that column, jump over to the “Add $8,000/5%” column and repeat the process.  Then go to “Add $15,000/5% and repeat again.

 

  1. Finally, erase 1.05 from memory and enter 1.08, then do the remaining three columns as before.

 

      Add $3000

each year

    Add $8,000

each year

    Add $15,000

each year

Year

Year-end total,5%

Year-end total,8%

Year-end total,5%

Year-end total,8%

Year-end total, 5%

Year-end total,8%

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

21

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

 

 

 

 

 

 

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

25